What can ice skating teach us about self regulation? Much, I think.
I happen to believe an ice skating rink of any size is the source
of much hand wringing and anxiety for many a regulator. Consider the following: a mass of human beings with metal knives
strapped to their feet sliding around, all at varying speeds, wearing very
little protective equipment. Throw
children into the mix and this must surely create feigned nervousness for those
with a hankering for government rules.
There’s more. Inside
the rink, the absence of life saving safety devices is forefront – no stop signs,
warning signs, speed bumps, traffic signals, right-of-way indicators, flares,
flashing signals, directional indicators, or other crucial safety controls are
present to warn wary skaters of the obvious dangers.
How is it then, despite this unabridged lawlessness, very
few accidents actually occur. (I base
this on my own experience skating) Given
that during one hour of skating on an Olympic-sized rink filled with 350
skaters, opportunities for accidents must be north of 10,000. In fact, casual observation of skating would
seem to suggest that it’s suicide. At
the conclusion of one hour of frolicking on the ice one would expect to carry
off numerous dead bodies, sweep rows of teeth off the rink, and mop the blood
from the ice. Yet, with few exceptions,
this isn’t the case.
Yesterday, I took the
family skating in Seoul plaza in
downtown Seoul.
A mere 1,000 Won got you
onto the rink, skates included.
They limit
the number to 500 each hour (at only 1,000 WON, there is almost unlimited
demand, so they ration).
During our
hour-long skate, I noticed several accidents, but most were the result of
inexperienced skaters stumbling and falling, not reckless careening into other
people.
I was amazed at how, as human
beings, we instinctively know how to avoid an accident.
People are adept at self-regulating and
social adaption.
We rarely require prodding
and herding.
The lesson here is this: observed chaos needn’t always
regulating. Top-down rules, well-meaning
regulations, and other impositions by the state often lead to unforeseen and undesirable
consequences. One example is traffic on
Yongsan (Army base) during school hours.
School hours on post are marked by interminable waiting and dreadfully
long lines of traffic. The cause, at
least in part, is the over-regulation by the MPs (military police). During school hours, MPs erect barriers, traffic
cones, and other vehicular impeding devices, all in an effort to manage
the traffic. Army officials see traffic
and devise plans (rules and regulations) because they think their plan for
managing it will result in fewer accidents and decreased wait times. I would argue their plans have the opposite
effect.
If, instead, officials allowed traffic to behave organically
and instinctively, results would dramatically improve, and at much lower
costs. But this rarely happens.
Why?
Why is the proclivity for regulating chaos so prevalent in
our society today? Why have we been
fooled into believing that top-down instruction is always superior than
bottom-up self regulation? Not only do
we tend to surrender our liberty with all this oversight, we are left with fewer
(good) choices.
So, the next time you
witness chaos, tarry a bit before calling for government oversight. Chances are people will figure it out on
their own.